It's All About Image

There are so many issues surrounding this piece in today's NY Times.  Please reflect on the following and please look back on your readings if you can for some help.  Must we always have a squeaky clean image when it depends on revisionist history or denial?  How are such points in history promoted? The politics?  Hey, I live in this state and from my perspective its reputation is well deserved. Chicago politics is, well, just that but I love the entrepreneurial tour operator.

Images are quickly lost when they are good and hang on forever when bad.   If I asked the average person for an image of London what do you think they often mention?